Lane clarified his view that the Fort Collins case applies all across Colorado. In an interview with the Denver Post, Mr. After receiving the summons, she filed a formal complaint with the City… and hired an lawyer: civil rights attorney David Lane. Krokos reminded Loveland’s police officer of the Fort Collins lawsuit, the officer told her the ruling applied only to Fort Collins. Theoretically, the Fort Collins City Council could have appealed the case to the US Supreme Court, but instead chose to pay a $200,000 settlement to the plaintiffs. “We’re left, as the district court was, to suspect that the City’s professed interest in protecting children derives not from any morphological differences between men’s and women’s breasts but from negative stereotypes depicting women’s breasts, but not men’s breasts, as sex objects…” In the majority opinion, Judge Gregory Phillips wrote: In that case, the Court of Appeals upheld a district court decision that the city’s topless law violated the Fourteenth Amendment. That ordinance allowed men to appear topless in public, but prohibited women (over the age of 10) from doing the same. the City of Fort Collins, which challenged a 2015 Fort Collins ordinance.
Effie krokos topless free#
This past February, the 19th Circuit Court of Appeals decided a case named Free the Nipple vs. In fact, the courts seem to have taken Mr. “It was a hot day… I didn’t think I was doing anything wrong.” “I knew my rights I told the officer I knew my rights - this is a topless state,” Ms. After someone called in a complaint to the City of Loveland police department, Officer Greg Harris came to her door and wrote her a summons. The courts have since expanded upon the possible applications of that clause.Īccording to several news stories that appeared last week, twenty-year-old Effie Krokos was playing Frisbee in her fiancé’s front yard… on a warm day this past September… and decided to take off her shirt.
The Fourteenth Amendment applied substantially more constitutional restrictions upon the states than had existed before the Civil War. That’s the promise of justice contained in the US Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment, which took effect in 1868 - the so-called Equal Protection Clause which states: “…nor shall any State deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”Ī primary motivation for this clause was to validate equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed that all citizens would have the guaranteed right to equal protection by law.
0 kommentar(er)
